Shipped off my camera last week to Canon, and they've received it and are repairing it. I don't know how long it will take before I get it back, but hopefully it will only be a few more days.
In the meantime, I spent a lot of time looking for a replacement lens for the 18-55 IS that came as part of the kit. While I was in Florida I spent a lot of time walking around with that lens, and while I got some really good shots from it, I always felt like I was fighting it a bit. Specifically, it was really hard to get a shallow DOF because the lens just isn't fast enough. It was serviceable when stopped down, but I couldn't get a lot of the selective focus shots I would have liked to. I kept going back to the 50mm prime for those, but that's a bit of a pain when walking around because there's no zoom, so I found myself rather limited in the kinds of shots I could take.
The solution, of course, was to look for a replacement "every day" lens. In the end, my decision came down to three choices - two really expensive (for me) and one less so.
The two expensive choices were two of Canon's L series lenses, the
EF 24-70/2.8 L and the
EF 24-105/4 L IS. Both are about the same price - right around $1000 - and both are by all accounts excellent glass. The 24-70 is bigger, heavier, and faster.
The 24-105 is longer, lighter, a stop slower, and boasts Image Stabilization, which helps when hand-holding the camera. If I were to spend this much, I could only get one, and I went back and forth for days over which I preferred. Did I want a longer lens with IS, or a faster lens? The size and weight of the 24-70 didn't bother me, and in fact I kind of liked the idea of having that behemoth on my camera.
The less expensive option was the
Tamron AF 28-75mm f/2.8 SP XR ZL Di LD Aspherical (IF). Yes, that's more than your recommended daily allowance of acronyms. The really germane information in the name is that the lense is 28-75/2.8 - a little shorter on the wide end than the Canons, and a tad longer than the 24-70 while being just as fast. I've read pretty much every word printed on the internet that I could find about this lens, and what I think I know is that the lens is extremely sharp, boasting image quality that rivals the Canon 24-70. Its auto focus is a little slower, especially in low light. It's not nearly as well-built - almost entirely plastic versus the Canon's weather-sealed, metal, L series quality construction. It's also smaller and lighter than the Canon, by a lot. Oh, and it's about 1/3rd the price, clocking in at about $350, plus it has a 6-year warranty versus the 1-year on the Canons.
In the end, as much as I really wanted one of the Canons, I decided the Tamron was really the better value for me right now. I don't need weather sealing, for instance - my camera isn't weather sealed anyway. Sure, either Canon would last me forever, but there's no reason I can't upgrade to the 24-70 some day if I so choose. Most importantly, the money saved allowed me to spend some money on another toy.
One of the things I'm becoming more interested in exploring is flash photography, and the built-in flash on the camera just wasn't going to cut it. With the money I saved on the lens, I picked up a
Canon 430EXII Speedlight. Now I not only get to play with a new lens, but also start learning how to properly use a flash.
Now if they'd just send my camera back...